Year : 2014
Number of Pages : 59
leaves
Adviser : Dr. Roger D. Posadas
Executive Summary
The
Philippines has experienced problems on waste disposal despite the fact that
there were already existing laws on proper management of solid wastes in the
country. Generally, the increasing volume of solid wastes was indeed the result
equally growing population of the country. On the other hand, new technologies
to make life easier emerged as the years passed by. This parallel growth has
provided the country both benefits and problems. The benefits are of course
convenience that the new technology has brought to the people. Among these new
technologies are the emergence of light and easy to dispose packaging materials
such as plastics and Styropor. Although these technologies provided convenience
to the people, it as well generated another problem which is the increasing
volume of solid waste not only in dumpsites but also in the rural areas. About
40 percent of the total solid wastes in the country are plastics and Styropor
while the rest are biodegradable wastes. While the biodegradable wastes are
easy to decompose, the plastics and Styropor would take million years to
decompose. This has been the reason why waste plastics and Styropor are
increasingly deposited in the areas where they were actually disposed. This
problem is noticeable especially in Metropolitan Manila area where flooding has
been the main problem during rainy seasons. Flooding is mainly caused by these
non-biodegradable wastes clogged into the city's drainage system. In order to
address this issue, the Philippine government enacted the Republic Act 9003
also known as The Ecological Solid Waste Management Act 9003 also known as The
Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 which otherwise created the
National Solid Waste Management Council (NSWMC) as policy-making body and
technical support providers. The Department of Science and Technology (DOST)
being one of the active members of NSWMC had taken initiatives, through its
research and development institutes, to develop technologies for recycling
these biodegradable wastes as well as non-biodegradable wastes. The Industrial
Technology Development Institute (ITDI) of the Department of Science and
Technology (DOST) was able to developed more than two (2) technologies for
biodegradable wastes which includes agricultural wastes (biomass). The other
technologies were intended for recycling/reuse of waste plastics and Styropor
into functional products. These technologies include Processes of Mixing
Plastics into Asphalt Aggregates and the Process of Melting Wastes Plastics and
Styropor to increase its density and transform into usable products. The latter
is commonly called Densifier and will be the subject of our evaluation.
The
Styro-Plastic Densifier Technology (for oftentimes referred to as the
Densifier) was developed by the Materials Science Division (MSD) of ITDI and
granted by the Intellectual Property Office (IPOPHL) a Utility Model
Registration as process technology. It was transferred to local fabricators,
who have undergone and passed the accreditation process, via a licensing
agreement called the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The technology had gained
so much popularity and in fact recognized by various awards-giving bodies. The
MOA authorizes the Accredited Fabricators to fabricate and commercialize the
technology while the technology was being disseminated to the rest of the
country through DOST Regional and Provincial Offices. Initially, its impact had
been evident in the reduction of plastic wastes and as income generator to some
dumpsite workers. However, the profit that the end-product generated was quite
low making the technology not suitable for business operation in an end-user
level. However, the profit is significantly in the manufacturing level
(fabricators). On the other hand, the technology generated some problems in the
technical as well as the non-technical aspects. These problems affected the
transfer and dissemination of the technology and both parties involved. There were
initiatives undertaken but have not totally addressed most of the issues.
Besides, the Republic Act 10055 also known as Philippine Technology Transfer
Act of 2009 was approved about five (5) years after the start of the
commercialization of the technology. This urged the concerned parties to review
specific elements and components of the system but those initiatives were more
focused on the technical aspects rather than all components of the system
including the laws, policies and procedures governing the process and how do
they affect each other. Having seen the issues, I decided to include the
technology in list of selected topics for my special paper. Additionally, it
was one of the most discussed technologies in the regions and was recommended
by my former boss. The scope of this paper covers things associated with the
transfer and dissemination of Densifier Technology, identify and evaluate areas
having technical and legal concerns, and lastly, provide recommendations and
conclusions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.