Year : 2013
Number of Pages : 55
leaves
Adviser : Dr. Serafin D. Talisayon
Executive Summary
Academics
have debated the meaning of "knowledge" since the word was invented,
but let's not get into that here. A dictionary definition is "the facts,
feelings or experiences known by a person or group of people" (Collins
English Dictionary). Knowledge is derived from information but it is richer and
more meaningful than information. It includes familiarity, awareness and
understanding gained through experience or study, and results from making
comparisons, identifying consequences, and making connections. Some experts
include wisdom and insight in their definitions of knowledge. In organizational
terms, knowledge is generally though of as being "know how", or
"actionable information". The last point is an important one. Today's
organization contain a vast amount of knowledge and the company at hand is
certainly no exception. However, in applying knowledge management principles
and practices in our organization, knowledge is not our end, but the means for
further action. What we are trying to do is to use our knowledge to get better
at doing what we do. Knowledge must not be seen as something that is supplied
from one person to another, or from better off countries to developing
countries, but rather as something that can flow back and forth and be
continually improved, adapted, and refreshed using knowledge management tools.
What is more, the latter are more effective where the specific knowledge,
relationships, and context of organizations and the external environment they
face are dealt with in an integrated and coherent manner. Knowledge management
(KM) is based on the idea that an organization's most valuable resource is the
knowledge of its people. Therefore, the extent to which an organization
performs well, will depend, among other things, on how effectively its people
can create new knowledge, share knowledge around the organization, and use that
knowledge to best effect. Knowledge management is first and foremost a
management discipline that treats intellectual capital as a managed asset. The
primary tools applied in the practice of knowledge management are
organizational dynamics, process engineering, and technology. These work in
concert to streamline and enhance the capture and flow of an organization's
data, information and knowledge and to deliver it to individuals and groups
engaged in accomplishing specific tasks. These individuals, or knowledge
workers, are unequivocally the most vital resource in the 21st-century company.
The primary goal of knowledge management is to deliver the intellectual
capacity of the firm to the knowledge workers who make the day to day decision
that in aggregate determine the success or failure of a business. Knowledge
management is not about creating a central database that is a complete replica
of all that is known by employees or that is embedded in the systems they use.
On the contrary, knowledge management is about embracing a diversity of
knowledge sources, from databases, Web sites, employees, and partners and
cultivating that knowledge where it resides, while capturing its context and
giving it greater meaning through its relation to other information in the
company. Knowledge management is not about turning knowledge workers into
interchangeable components by plugging them into some corporate knowledge base.
The strategic importance of knowledge in today's organization has been
discussed extensively and research has looked at various issues in developing
knowledge management systems. Both the characterization of knowledge and
alternate models for understanding the acquisition and use of such knowledge
have taken on significant prominence. This is due to the complexities
associated with acquiring and representing knowledge, and the varied nature of
its use in knowledge work. As they say, Knowledge is Power-and profit.
According to Bhandari Technologies (2010), one source of competitive advantage
is to diffuse throughout a company the unique, proprietary knowledge about
customers, competitors, products, and techniques that resides in the minds of
its employees. But many efforts at knowledge management have failed to deliver
that advantage, because they haven't focused on the creation and broad exchange
of knowledge within a company. Establishing an internal knowledge market with
its own unique approaches to pricing,exchange, market facilitation and
competition can solve that problem and boost productivity. Now on its 27th year
as an authority in retail and a major player in industrial services, the
company is proud to bring in new and exciting global brands, increase doors in
new territories and create new concept stores through an aggressive expansion
project in the Asian region. These goals would not be turned into a reality
without the business development research team's help and wisdom. It is through
them those new brands that are being called and source upon are carefully
studied as they are able to forecast market movements and watch trends evolve.
The role of the business development research team is crucial to the business
as they serve as the filter of the brands coming in it is in their hands
whether much attention would be given to a specific brand or a brand would be
let go off. It is this kind of decision making process where knowledge is
greatly needed and relied on. Over the past years, the Primer Group of
Companies has grown faster than expected. The next step to be taken largely
depends on the business development team and its research team. The team since
its inception two years ago was the one tasked in brand sourcing and research.
It is the goal of the team to deliver and present important points that will
help management in acquiring and letting go of a brand. With this tedious task
at hand comes a practice that makes repetitive work as there's no system being
followed in doing the assigned task. The problem has been a recurring concern
not only by the team but the clients we are serving such as the brand managers
and the marketing team. Idea of having a structured system remains as it is and
never materialized as efforts were not that concentrated on the proposed
system. The output of this project would help present the concept of knowledge
management and its benefits to the team as well as assess status of critical knowledge
in turn developing a conceptual framework.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.