Year : 2005
Number of Pages : 87
leaves
Adviser : Prof. Goco
Executive Summary
Manila
Electric Company (MERALCO) invests large amount of resources annually to build,
expand, operate and maintain its electric distribution system. This system is a
large man-made technological system of wires and various electromechanical
equipment assembled to deliver electricity from the point of supply to the
point of use by its more than four million customers. To ensure the reliable
and efficient performance of the energy delivery system, the utility need to
invest continuously to meet the growing demand for reliable supply of
electricity as more customers apply for service and increase their energy
consumption. The continued success and survival of the country depends on the
efficiency and effectiveness of its investments and operations. It also depends
on how well it can satisfy its stakeholders, namely, the shareholders,
customers and the regulator. Shareholders are concerned with the return on
their investments, while customers are concerned with affordability,
reliability and convenience of electric service. The company is also facing the
challenges of electric power industry restructuring that is fast taking shape.
These challenges include business unbundling, competition in the Supply Sector,
competitive energy market and performance based regulation in the Distribution
Sector. The latter is adopted from the UK CPI-X model that allows an electric
utility to increase tariff by the rate of inflation CPI minus an efficiency
factor X. This tariff model splits the efficiency gain between the utility by
providing incentives to the utility to be more efficient and to the customers
by guaranteeing tariff reduction. Even before the advent of power industry
restructuring, the electric power industry has long recognized and exploited
technologies to continuously improve efficiency, reduce cost and improve
reliability and service quality. These include technologies such as
information, computer and communication technologies, material technology, etc.
Given, however, the complexity of the distribution system, assembling these
technologies over time to achieve the desired optimum performance of the system
still remains a challenge. An integrative framework and a business philosophy
is therefore needed that will ensure that the distribution system achieve the strategic
goals of the company. The concept of asset management has long been employed by
asset-intensive industries such as transportation, telecommunications, gas,
water and electric utilities. In the last 10 years or so, a mature form of
asset management known as the Strategic Asset Management (SAM) emerged and has
been adopted by a number of utilities in UK, US, Australia and New Zealand in
response to PBR regulation. SAM advocates prudent investments and economic
operation of the distribution system and its equipment. It is a management
discipline and a systematic process of managing the lifecycle cost of the
electric distribution system to optimize their performance and achieve the
targeted levels of reliability and service quality, while mitigating risks. The
asset lifecycle starts with planning, design, procurement, construction,
operation, maintenance, retirement and disposal of the asset. It ensures, not
only, the management of financial, technical and service quality aspects, but
also business risks, personnel and public safety and environment protection. It
is also comprehensive in terms of technologies, processes and tools that it
employs in an integrative manner. SAM reconstructs the traditional organization
of utilities into both a process-based and role and responsibility-based
organization. This is implemented by separating three distinct functions : the
Asset Owner, Asset Manager, and the Service-Provider. The Asset Owner is the
franchise holder and is concerned with overall return on investment. The Asset
Manager is concerned with decision-making and optimum management of the
distribution system on behalf of the Asset Owner. The Service Provider is
responsible for all operational services for the assets, such as design,
construction, operation, maintenance, restoration and resource management. A
key feature of the SAM process is its holistic approach to integrate the
different elements of asset management to ensure long-term success and
sustainability. This approach integrates the interrelationship of corporate
vision, asset strategy and business strategy. The asset strategy is concerned
with the capabilities, capacities and condition and performance of the electric
asset. It requires the development of the asset plan based on sound engineering
and economic principles. The business strategy addresses the business
capabilities that are achieved through people, process, information and
technology. It separates the business process into the decision making process
(performed by the Asset Manager) and the action process (performed by the
Service Provider). The decision-making process includes business intelligence,
performance management, investment planning, risk management, information
management, technology management, and resource management. The action process
includes work management, design, construction, operation and maintenance. The
experience of the utilities that implemented SAM shows a remarkable success in
terms of improving efficiencies, reducing costs and improving the reliability
and service quality levels. A number of these utilities implemented SAM to
address the challenges of PBR regulation, some introduced contestability in its
service provision function, AND some developed new competencies for new
markets. The LE Group (based in UK) was able to successfully leverage SAM to
increase it market share through merger and acquisition. In assessing SAM as a
strategic technology for MERALCO, the study used Porter's five forces
competitive analysis and Kaplan's balance scorecard. The study also assessed
SAM in terms of the key performance parameters identified such as capacity,
power quality, reliability, cost of service, system efficiency, customer
service quality and safety, public health and environment protection. It also
assessed SAM in terms of three strategic domains : supporting existing
business, altering rules of rivalry, and creating fundamentally new business.
The study identified several success factors in SAM implementation, notably,
top management support, project plan and organization, technology transfer
agent (e.g., consultant), processes to be implemented, change management,
strategic competencies, and lastly, the SAM information system. In summary, SAM
provides a robust, comprehensive and holistic strategic technological alternative
in addressing the challenges of industry restructuring, specifically,
performance-based regulation. It also provides new opportunities for business
growth by developing new competencies, transforms the organization to a higher
maturity level of managing the distribution system, enhances business processes
and exploits technologies effectively. It is, thus, the recommendation of this
study for MERALCO to consider Strategic Asset Management as a strategic
management technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.