Year : 2006
Number of Pages : 88
leaves
Adviser : Dr. Serafin D. Talisayon
Executive Summary
Knowledge
plays a strategically important role in ensuring and sustaining the success of
an organization. In today's competitive world, mining the tacit knowledge of
employees can be considered as one of the competitive strategies of a firm.
According to Paul Chin [2], the norm is that every company has what is called
isolated "pockets" of knowledge contained in the heads of employees
throughout the organization's various departments and workgroups, not realizing
that a large portion of the population may benefit from codifying the
experiences, expertise and know-how of knowledge workers. Usually, too much
time is wasted by the employees in trying to figure out a problem or looking
for steps on how to perform certain tasks. Although a knowledge sharing has
always taken place informally between certain groups of employees, it becomes a
problem when the knowledge worker leaves the organization since they take their
expertise with them. In the event that the knowledge worker has transferred his
expertise through formal means (i.e. knowledge transfer), it is too much to
expect that at least 80 percent of the departing employee's tacit knowledge has
been captured and transferred successfully. It is hoped that the knowledge
transferred to the remaining employees will continue and sustain the knowledge
of life cycle. As David Skyme [12] indicated in the article "The 3Cs of
Knowledge Sharing", one of the challenges of knowledge management is that
of getting people to share their knowledge. Why should people give up their
hard-won knowledge, when it is one of their key sources of personal advantage?
In some organizations, sharing is natural. In others the old dictum
"knowledge is power" reigns. One of the fundamental steps in
implementing a Knowledge Management System in an organization is the conduct of
a Knowledge Management Audit. The KM issues presented above are some of the
things that this project will try to uncover. In carrying out a Knowledge
Management Audit for the Infrastructure Group of American International
Underwriters-Manila Regional Technology Center (or AIU-MRTC), we will look at
the KM issues faced by the Infrastructure Group such as cultural,
organizational and technological issues, which hinder knowledge flow, knowledge
sharing, and knowledge growth the group's knowledge needs and knowledge gaps
and potential risks to its current KM practices, etc. We will also look at some
of the recommended strategies and next steps which the Infrastructure Group can
pursue to improve its knowledge management practices.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.