Year : 2010
Number of Pages : 45
leaves
Adviser : Prof. Glen
A. Imbang
Executive Summary
This
research material analyzed and explained the impact of the BIWA tools to the
service management responsibilities of this team in HP. The team has been doing
a number of innovation tools within their free time but there are no concrete
analysis done to measure the benefits from such innovations. Since these
innovations are done on-top of their regular responsibilities, it would be
beneficial to see if the results are helpful and probably be used to determine
if such initiative should be continued. One tool was analyzed. This is the DM
Assistant which is used by the team to conduct the hand-over process. The DM
Assistant automates the extraction of data from the Service Desk which consumes
time and can result to data accuracy problems. To measure the benefits, the
chosen framework was the learning curve. This framework projected the total
cost of producing the hand-over report over the period of 6 months and compared
it with the actual results covered within the same period. There are observed
inconsistencies between the two models as explained in the study. The study
cited 3 studies as reference to the methodology used. The first study covered
the learning curve framework how it works and the principles behind it. The
second story explained the proper application and use of experience curves when
not to use it and the common errors in interpreting its results. The third
article dealt with technology adoption and explore the ideas/methods on how
conduct technology adoptions, when are they applicable and the advantages and
disadvantages on each method. Data analysis was done by interpreting the graph
of the actual data and the derived data from the learning curve formula. This
study provided the learnings gained and recommendations if this study would be
continued in the future. The insights on the effect of the current tool were
also provided.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.