Year : 2012
Number of Pages : 63
leaves
Adviser : Dr. Roger D.
Posadas
Executive Summary
The study
was conducted to assess the state of the rice industry in Capiz in terms of
productivity and its impact on the farmers. Capiz is a province with a total
land area of 2,633.2 square kilometers characterized by plains, rolling hills
on the southern side and coastal and swampy areas on the northern side. It is
one of the four provinces in Panay Island and the biggest island comprising
Western Visayas. It has 701,664 people according to 2007 census and has a
population density of 267 person/square kilometer. The province is composed of
16 municipalities and one city, the City of Roxas, its capital. Each of all the
municipalities and the city has areas developed for rice land. Capiz has
developed 50,000.50 hectares of riceland, 35 percent of which are irrigated.
These are tilled by 44,647 farmers owning or farming an average of 1.12
hectares each. These farms are planted to rice 2.43 times every year. Capiz
contributed 17.6 percent of the regional rice production and accounting 2.4
percent or 388,093 MT in 2009 of the national production. The average yield per
hectare in 2009-2010 was 3.385 MT/year which means the yield was only 1.39
MT/hectare per crop. The average cropping frequency is 2.43/year (2009). The
best practice was 6.1-10.3 MT/hectare according to Sebastian, Alviola and
Francisco (Bridging the Rice Yield Gap in the Philippines FAO, 2000). Although
the conditions were different from that of Capiz at the time the study was
conducted, the message here says it can be done, and this stands as a challenge
to Capiz farmers. Based on the value chain study, the production cost according
to BAS was Php10.92/kg in 2009. The farm gate price for the last five years was
P13.00/kg, in effect, the farmers earned a margin of Php2.08 kg only or an
income of Php2,891/hectare/cropping in four months. At 1.12 hectare average
farm size, each farmer earned a meager Php3,238.00 during the 4-month cropping
period. It was even less at Php1,900.00 based on study by CapSU during the
October 25, 2011 R&D Cluster Planning Workshop, where all costs not
normally considered were accounted like the farmer's or his familities' time
spent on the farm during the cropping period. The OPA's recommended farm budget
were not followed due to lack of fund, thus, the farmers settled for a lower
input, at Php10,978/hectare (based on interview of 40 farmers in 2012). The
study revealed that the major cause of low productivity was attributed to
cultural practices and partly, environmental factor. These include practices in
land preparation, crop establishment especially choice of seeds and crop
management. In land preparation, no soil analyses were conducted prior to
fertilizer application. Fertilization was mostly based on intuition. It was not
known whether the pH of soil was within the recommended level and which type
and how much fertilizer was actually needed on specific soil. The lead agency
in rice production in Capiz, the OPA were using the rice production protocol
developed by PhilRice known as "Palay Check". This is their banner
technology on rice. Even so, this protocol does not include soil analysis
during land preparation. In the case of crop establishment, the selection of
seed was very important. Ideally, hybrid rice seed is the best
(Php3,500/bag/ha), followed by certified seeds (Php1,200-1,300/bag/ha). But due
to low farm budget, the farmers settled for inbred seed which costs Php800.00
only per hectare. Another problem along with this activity is the manner of
planting. The farmers are still using the manual broadcasting method where
seedling is not uniform and requires three times more seeds than transplanting
method or when mechanical drum seeder is used. In these methods, the distance
and amount of seed or seedlings sowed are uniform and calibrated to what is
necessary only. All the above factors were actually aggravated by farmers'
attitude. They refuse to sustain the recommended technology taught to them.
They often revert back to their old practice when the AEWs missed following
them up on regular basis.
Adding to
the woes of the farmers was the lack of post-harvest support facilities that
will enable them to wait for a better price before disposing their produce. The
four warehouses of NFA in the province were not enough to serve all the
farmers' needs. In fact, it was not the farmers who benefitted most from NFA
facilities, instead, it was the private traders dealing with NFA who were
taking advantage of the opportunity because they have resources. In addition,
the changing climate was likewise taking a toll on the farmers especially those
with farms located in low lying areas. Using SWOT Analysis and Porter's Diamond
Model, it was determined that the industry has the potential to be developed
into a cluster. The development fronts were identified as well as the cluster
players. The development fronts were : land preparation crop establishment crop
management harvest-postharvest value-adding support services farm mechanization
and irrigation. The key players with their roles in the cluster are described
below : CapSU-shall access the available technologies and information by
forming alliance with RDIs and serve as conduit for all the resources available
applicable to the cluster. Under this mechanism, CapSU will act as virtual
extension arm of the RDIs DA-in the national level, it is responsible for
ensuring the rice sufficiency program of the country. In the provincial and
municipal level, the OPA and OMA are tasked to provide the technical and
logistic support to the industry to attain their committed target NIA-tasked to
provide irrigation service to the cluster using both conventional and
non-conventional irrigation system. Non-conventional system relates to small
farm reservoir or small water impounding irrigation system NFA-price
stabilization function, it also provides drying, milling and warehousing
services GFIs to lessen the exposure of the farmers to usury by providing new
fund portfolios designed to counter the offer by private lenders DOST provides
direction and fund for the industry as well as technology generation. NGOs
shall work on the social dimension of farming to prepare the farmers adopt
modern technologies Private Suppliers, Traders-They fill in the gap resulting
from inadequate support services provided by the government. They need to be
regulated Farmers-being the most vulnerable and oppressed member of the
cluster, they should be converted from mere farmers to become
farmer-entrepreneurs and LGUs are responsible for local rice industry
department by providing direction, funds and other resources in order to
atttain the provincial production targets. Other support agencies and facilities
located within the province shall be treated as direct cluster component. Thus,
by assembling and concentrating direct and indirect support services in rice
industry into a cluster in one geographic area, the meager industry resource
can be optimized. Problems can be address at once in real time at minimum cost
if these support services are located near each other.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.